You finished writing an email, a resume, a blog post, or a school paper. You think it looks good. But is "recieve" or "receive" correct? What about "seperate" or "separate"? Paste your text into a spell checker and find out in 2 seconds.
Check spelling and grammar in one step. Free, no signup.
Open Grammar & Spell CheckerPeople use these terms interchangeably, but they catch different things:
| Type | What it catches | What it misses |
|---|---|---|
| Spell check | Misspelled words (recieve, seperate, occured) | Wrong word, correct spelling (their/there, too/to, affect/effect) |
| Grammar check | Wrong word choice, subject-verb agreement, tense errors | Some domain-specific terms, intentional style choices |
| Both together | Spelling + grammar + punctuation + style | Less, but still needs a human eye for tone and clarity |
Our tool does both. When you paste text, it checks spelling, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure in one pass. But understanding the difference helps you know what to trust automatically and what to verify yourself.
These trip up everyone, including professional writers. If you have ever second-guessed any of them, you are in good company.
| Wrong | Right | Memory trick |
|---|---|---|
| recieve | receive | I before E except after C |
| seperate | separate | There is A RAT in separate |
| occured | occurred | Double C, double R |
| accomodate | accommodate | Double C, double M |
| definately | definitely | It has the word FINITE in it |
| neccessary | necessary | One C, two S's (a shirt: 1 collar, 2 sleeves) |
| embarass | embarrass | Double R, double S |
| consious | conscious | SCI in the middle, like science |
| wierd | weird | Weird breaks the "I before E" rule. Weird is weird. |
| noticable | noticeable | Keep the E when adding -able to words ending in CE |
A spell checker catches all of these instantly. But it will not catch "I went too the store" because "too" is a correctly spelled word. That is where grammar checking picks up the slack.
| Where | Built-in spell check? | Grammar check? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrome / Edge / Firefox | Yes | No | Red underlines on misspelled words in text fields |
| Google Docs | Yes | Basic | Red underlines + blue grammar suggestions |
| Microsoft Word | Yes | Good | Editor sidebar with detailed suggestions |
| Apple Pages / Notes | Yes | Limited | Basic autocorrect + spell check |
| Slack / Discord | Yes (browser) | No | Relies on browser spell check. Desktop app varies. |
| Code editors (VS Code) | Not default | No | Need extension (Code Spell Checker is popular) |
| Email (Outlook, Gmail) | Yes | Basic | Gmail spell check is weaker than Google Docs |
| Social media post composers | Varies | No | Twitter/X, Instagram: no built-in check |
The gap: most platforms only give you basic spell check. They catch "teh" but miss "their" when you meant "there." An actual grammar tool catches both.
You already have spell check in your browser. So when does it make sense to paste text into a dedicated tool?
If you write for an international audience, these are the ones that come up most often:
| US English | UK English | Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| color | colour | -or vs -our |
| organize | organise | -ize vs -ise |
| center | centre | -er vs -re |
| defense | defence | -se vs -ce |
| traveled | travelled | Single vs double L |
| catalog | catalogue | Dropped -ue in US |
Neither is wrong. Just be consistent within a document. Do not use "color" in one paragraph and "colour" in the next.
Check spelling, grammar, and punctuation in one step.
Open Grammar & Spell Checker